<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESRI ArcWeb 2006 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spatially Adjusted with James Fee &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spatially Adjusted with James Fee &#187; Blog Archive &#187;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scoble links to Spatially Adjusted in a non-GYM post, maybe Public ArcWeb Services 2006 is timed just right to take advantage of this Google Mapping rut people seem to be in. Heck, I bet Scoble doesn&#8217;t even know about ArcGIS Explorer, all the fun of Google Earth, but none of the &#8220;GYM&#8221; baggage. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scoble links to Spatially Adjusted in a non-GYM post, maybe Public ArcWeb Services 2006 is timed just right to take advantage of this Google Mapping rut people seem to be in. Heck, I bet Scoble doesn&#038;#8217;t even know about ArcGIS Explorer, all the fun of Google Earth, but none of the &#038;#8220;GYM&#038;#8221; baggage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spatially Adjusted with James Fee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fall 2005 ArcNews is out and does anyone really care?</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spatially Adjusted with James Fee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fall 2005 ArcNews is out and does anyone really care?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A perfect example to why quarterly publications aren&#8217;t valuable anymore is the latest ArcNews. The ESRI rss feed sums it up perfectly, &#8220;User Conference highlights and Image Server news among the top stories&#8220;. Both topics are important, but quite dated. If ArcNews was more relevant to current news the top stories should be ArcWeb 2006 and the ArcGIS Visual Studio .NET Integration Framework. ArcWeb is in the issue, but the announcement that Public ArcWeb services are available, YIKES! Oh well, maybe by March we&#8217;ll get some ESRI Katrina stories. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A perfect example to why quarterly publications aren&#038;#8217;t valuable anymore is the latest ArcNews. The ESRI rss feed sums it up perfectly, &#038;#8220;User Conference highlights and Image Server news among the top stories&#038;#8220;. Both topics are important, but quite dated. If ArcNews was more relevant to current news the top stories should be ArcWeb 2006 and the ArcGIS Visual Studio .NET Integration Framework. ArcWeb is in the issue, but the announcement that Public ArcWeb services are available, YIKES! Oh well, maybe by March we&#038;#8217;ll get some ESRI Katrina stories. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Holmstrand</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip Holmstrand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know much about ArcWeb other than the demo&#039;s I played with at the UC, but from what I saw this is no doubt the most impressive Internet Mapping product ESRI has created to date. I think for probably 75% of those who would consider putting their data on the Internet, ArcWeb services is more than enough. Why mess around with server farms and keeping map servers running if you can let someone else do all of that?

Worth checking out for sure...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about ArcWeb other than the demo&#8217;s I played with at the UC, but from what I saw this is no doubt the most impressive Internet Mapping product ESRI has created to date. I think for probably 75% of those who would consider putting their data on the Internet, ArcWeb services is more than enough. Why mess around with server farms and keeping map servers running if you can let someone else do all of that?</p>
<p>Worth checking out for sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto on the REST support. This is actually a no-brainer since it will open up the services to more developers, especially those who feel that SOAP is overkill (like me!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on the REST support. This is actually a no-brainer since it will open up the services to more developers, especially those who feel that SOAP is overkill (like me!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Baker</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been waiting for REST support since I heard about it at the UC!  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for REST support since I heard about it at the UC!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacewaitress</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spacewaitress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been avoiding ArcWeb because of SOAP, so REST is welcome news.  I&#039;m wondering if I should sign up now, or wait until it is officially released as I&#039;d hate to put effort into something that might change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been avoiding ArcWeb because of SOAP, so REST is welcome news.  I&#8217;m wondering if I should sign up now, or wait until it is officially released as I&#8217;d hate to put effort into something that might change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/11/21/esri-arcweb-2006-released/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=391#comment-650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can&#039;t all of ESRI&#039;s webpages look that nice?

I wish I knew more about programming as this ArcWeb looks really nice.  Hopefully others can create and share some good ArcWeb mashups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t all of ESRI&#8217;s webpages look that nice?</p>
<p>I wish I knew more about programming as this ArcWeb looks really nice.  Hopefully others can create and share some good ArcWeb mashups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

