<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The one fatal flaw in mashups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Art of Geography weblog &#187; The one fatal flaw in mashups</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the Art of Geography weblog &#187; The one fatal flaw in mashups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The one fatal flaw in mashups: &#8220; [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The one fatal flaw in mashups: &#038;#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Holmstrand</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip Holmstrand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A real world example of this:

Yahoo recently decided to roll back their geocoding support on their API considerably, which had a negative impact on my batch geocoding tool (which is a mashup of sorts.) 

Luckily I figured out a workaround which so my service was not disabled, though its not quite as sweet as it once was.

My advice to anyone who&#039;s venturing into mashups: tread lightly and always have a backup plan. 

-Phillip]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real world example of this:</p>
<p>Yahoo recently decided to roll back their geocoding support on their API considerably, which had a negative impact on my batch geocoding tool (which is a mashup of sorts.) </p>
<p>Luckily I figured out a workaround which so my service was not disabled, though its not quite as sweet as it once was.</p>
<p>My advice to anyone who&#8217;s venturing into mashups: tread lightly and always have a backup plan. </p>
<p>-Phillip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Timoney</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Timoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I don&#039;t have a nickel for every great &quot;mashup&quot; idea someone came to me with, I&#039;ve had to improvise by repeating the mantra to would-be spatial capitalists &quot;the devil is in the data.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I don&#8217;t have a nickel for every great &#8220;mashup&#8221; idea someone came to me with, I&#8217;ve had to improvise by repeating the mantra to would-be spatial capitalists &#8220;the devil is in the data.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Parsons</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Parsons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James,

Spot on.. there is no such thing as &quot;free&quot; data somebody is covering the costs of the content somewhere is the mash-up chain, and this may or may not be sustainable !

ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>Spot on.. there is no such thing as &#8220;free&#8221; data somebody is covering the costs of the content somewhere is the mash-up chain, and this may or may not be sustainable !</p>
<p>ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vector One</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vector One]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought you were going to say, &quot;what is called a mashup has long been known as &#039;doin GIS&quot; 

I like your point though too...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you were going to say, &#8220;what is called a mashup has long been known as &#8216;doin GIS&#8221; </p>
<p>I like your point though too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/03/02/the-one-fatal-flaw-in-mashups/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=618#comment-1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent point and something that needs to be considered. Funny, just yesterday I bounced a similar question off an exec at GlobeXplorer.. here&#039;s what he replied... &quot;Most mashups are using web service image and street data that is licensed for personal and/or internal business use only, and not for resale.  Aside from that, all our customers pay for the premium data services we provide, even sites that appear to end users as &quot;free&quot;. Much like TeleAtlas and Navteq data supplied from various web services into other sites, including mashups.  We&#039;ve been doing this for seven years now, and growing very fast&quot;. Food for thought... Glenn (GISuser.com)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point and something that needs to be considered. Funny, just yesterday I bounced a similar question off an exec at GlobeXplorer.. here&#8217;s what he replied&#8230; &#8220;Most mashups are using web service image and street data that is licensed for personal and/or internal business use only, and not for resale.  Aside from that, all our customers pay for the premium data services we provide, even sites that appear to end users as &#8220;free&#8221;. Much like TeleAtlas and Navteq data supplied from various web services into other sites, including mashups.  We&#8217;ve been doing this for seven years now, and growing very fast&#8221;. Food for thought&#8230; Glenn (GISuser.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

