<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s New in ArcMap 9.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emeri</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emeri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have problems in exporting data from Excel 2007 in a format that can be read by ArcMap 9.1. Any help?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have problems in exporting data from Excel 2007 in a format that can be read by ArcMap 9.1. Any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[after 4 service packs now for 9.2, the same &#039;issues&#039; in even installing the software let alone all the other outstanding issues - isn&#039;t it time the Trade Discriptions Act, Sales of Goods Act etc started to be rigourously applied to the likes of ESRI and Microsoft for that matter ? They owe us all a lot of compensation..........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after 4 service packs now for 9.2, the same &#8216;issues&#8217; in even installing the software let alone all the other outstanding issues &#8211; isn&#8217;t it time the Trade Discriptions Act, Sales of Goods Act etc started to be rigourously applied to the likes of ESRI and Microsoft for that matter ? They owe us all a lot of compensation&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You do bring up a great point.  While line control is so much better, text control is still very lacking.  

I can tell you at 9.2 there is almost no reason other than text to export the map, in most cases.  We still will use our graphic artists for the maps they create now, but the days of having our GIS crew using copies of Illustrator are over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do bring up a great point.  While line control is so much better, text control is still very lacking.  </p>
<p>I can tell you at 9.2 there is almost no reason other than text to export the map, in most cases.  We still will use our graphic artists for the maps they create now, but the days of having our GIS crew using copies of Illustrator are over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mg</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The claim that users will no longer have to go to Illustrator to finish map is one I&#039;ve heard before ofr previous version of ArcMap. I am very doubtful that v. 9.2 is going to provide all the tools and productivity that exporting to Illie for good cartography now provides. As it stands now you save more time by exporting to a desktop design package because that software is so much better for editing text and graphic and so much mor efficient...i.e. no waiting for the map to re-draw. I wouldn&#039;t count on 9.2 to change that fact.

ArcGIS for GIS and Illustrator for Illustrating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The claim that users will no longer have to go to Illustrator to finish map is one I&#8217;ve heard before ofr previous version of ArcMap. I am very doubtful that v. 9.2 is going to provide all the tools and productivity that exporting to Illie for good cartography now provides. As it stands now you save more time by exporting to a desktop design package because that software is so much better for editing text and graphic and so much mor efficient&#8230;i.e. no waiting for the map to re-draw. I wouldn&#8217;t count on 9.2 to change that fact.</p>
<p>ArcGIS for GIS and Illustrator for Illustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Savage</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Savage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A complete list of changes in this documents:

http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.2/pdf/Whats_New_In_ArcGIS_92.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A complete list of changes in this documents:</p>
<p><a href="http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.2/pdf/Whats_New_In_ArcGIS_92.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.2/pdf/Whats_New_In_ArcGIS_92.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t really say much about the improvements as I&#039;m a beta tester and it is still a closed beta so I&#039;m just reporting what is said Brian.

Still read between the lines and you&#039;ll get me honest feeling about the pre-release of 9.2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really say much about the improvements as I&#8217;m a beta tester and it is still a closed beta so I&#8217;m just reporting what is said Brian.</p>
<p>Still read between the lines and you&#8217;ll get me honest feeling about the pre-release of 9.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AVUser</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AVUser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the detailed info James.  I can&#039;t wait for Excel support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed info James.  I can&#8217;t wait for Excel support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Timoney</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Timoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James:

Was it as exhausting reading writing the post as reading it.

All of this &quot;new and improved&quot; reminded me of the classic Onion article--

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28225


(Someone needs to re-write this for the GIS crowd).


BT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James:</p>
<p>Was it as exhausting reading writing the post as reading it.</p>
<p>All of this &#8220;new and improved&#8221; reminded me of the classic Onion article&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28225" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28225</a></p>
<p>(Someone needs to re-write this for the GIS crowd).</p>
<p>BT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian, I can&#039;t say specifically that they have fixed everything, but ESRI claims they have fixed over 600 &quot;issues&quot;.  I think on the Desktop side things will be much better than at 9.1.  I&#039;ll have to wait and see how the server side looks, but they claim they are in much better shape too.  The Desktop team hasn&#039;t really added that much, many of these new features are geodatabase driven as opposed to ArcMap driven.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I can&#8217;t say specifically that they have fixed everything, but ESRI claims they have fixed over 600 &#8220;issues&#8221;.  I think on the Desktop side things will be much better than at 9.1.  I&#8217;ll have to wait and see how the server side looks, but they claim they are in much better shape too.  The Desktop team hasn&#8217;t really added that much, many of these new features are geodatabase driven as opposed to ArcMap driven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/08/09/whats-new-in-arcmap-92/#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=955#comment-2166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really wish they would fix broken stuff before creating new features.  i have sooo many open cases right now, i feel like they are ignoring them.  ESRI starts a project but never finishes them it seems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish they would fix broken stuff before creating new features.  i have sooo many open cases right now, i feel like they are ignoring them.  ESRI starts a project but never finishes them it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

