<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update to Zillow v. Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adsk</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adsk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. zillow pretends to give you an estimate down to a dollar, which is impossible without a detailed inspection
2. the information they base their estimates on is a often inaccurate
3. in AZ many buyers use zillow as a negotiating tool and it&#039;s innacurate guesstimates influence house prices, thus becoming a self fulfilling prophecy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. zillow pretends to give you an estimate down to a dollar, which is impossible without a detailed inspection<br />
2. the information they base their estimates on is a often inaccurate<br />
3. in AZ many buyers use zillow as a negotiating tool and it&#8217;s innacurate guesstimates influence house prices, thus becoming a self fulfilling prophecy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerhard Ade</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerhard Ade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw a listing on the Northwest Multiple Listing website where a home is listed with the words &quot;priced below Zillow appraisal.&quot; Obviously that&#039;s nonsense. Zillow provides Zestimates which is another word for Guestimates. They get their data from public records and if that data are wrong so are  Zillow&#039;s.  An appraiser is a licensed professional. Zillow never pretended to a be a substitute.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw a listing on the Northwest Multiple Listing website where a home is listed with the words &#8220;priced below Zillow appraisal.&#8221; Obviously that&#8217;s nonsense. Zillow provides Zestimates which is another word for Guestimates. They get their data from public records and if that data are wrong so are  Zillow&#8217;s.  An appraiser is a licensed professional. Zillow never pretended to a be a substitute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmhartnett.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Arizona Realtors side with Zillow</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wmhartnett.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Arizona Realtors side with Zillow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &gt;Update to Zillow v. Arizona (James Fee) For the real estate-obsessed among you. This Arizona flap doesn&#8217;t really have a specific link to the world of newspapers and journalism, on which I try with varying degrees of interest to keep the blog at least semi-focused. As I said before, however, Zillow and services like it more generally represent the incredible, and mostly missed, opportunity newspapers have in real estate data. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt;Update to Zillow v. Arizona (James Fee) For the real estate-obsessed among you. This Arizona flap doesn&#8217;t really have a specific link to the world of newspapers and journalism, on which I try with varying degrees of interest to keep the blog at least semi-focused. As I said before, however, Zillow and services like it more generally represent the incredible, and mostly missed, opportunity newspapers have in real estate data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Swann</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Swann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloodhoundrealty.com/BloodhoundBlog/?p=1338&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zillow was amended out of the bill yesterday&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloodhoundrealty.com/BloodhoundBlog/?p=1338" rel="nofollow">Zillow was amended out of the bill yesterday</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davis</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Cameron Rex

So it would appear that this is aimed at Zillow.  Why make such a statement unless you were aiming the legistation at Zillow?  I mean Zillow does say their &quot;opinion&quot; is not a apprasial.  I mean where does this all lead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Cameron Rex</p>
<p>So it would appear that this is aimed at Zillow.  Why make such a statement unless you were aiming the legistation at Zillow?  I mean Zillow does say their &#8220;opinion&#8221; is not a apprasial.  I mean where does this all lead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Rex</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron Rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add to my last comment and to give a response to your last statement. This part of the statute addresses it...

&quot;This chapter does not apply to:  
2.  A natural person, a corporation through its officers or a partnership through its partners that deals in GIVES AN OPINION OF VALUE OF that person&#039;s or its own property and does not receive special compensation for the transaction IF THIS OPINION IS NOT REFERRED TO AS AN APPRAISAL.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add to my last comment and to give a response to your last statement. This part of the statute addresses it&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;This chapter does not apply to:<br />
2.  A natural person, a corporation through its officers or a partnership through its partners that deals in GIVES AN OPINION OF VALUE OF that person&#8217;s or its own property and does not receive special compensation for the transaction IF THIS OPINION IS NOT REFERRED TO AS AN APPRAISAL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Rex</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron Rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/04/23/update-to-zillow-v-arizona/#comment-5071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have taken a look at the proposed changes to the bill in Arizona, and it does not appear to have anything that limits Zillow.com (dependent on interpretation). The proposed changes are actually in line with the 2006 edition of USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice). You can read more about USPAP here (http://www.appraisalfoundation.org/s_appraisal/sec.asp?CID=3&amp;DID=3)

More on this later....I&#039;m actually in a USPAP class right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have taken a look at the proposed changes to the bill in Arizona, and it does not appear to have anything that limits Zillow.com (dependent on interpretation). The proposed changes are actually in line with the 2006 edition of USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice). You can read more about USPAP here (<a href="http://www.appraisalfoundation.org/s_appraisal/sec.asp?CID=3&#038;DID=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.appraisalfoundation.org/s_appraisal/sec.asp?CID=3&#038;DID=3</a>)</p>
<p>More on this later&#8230;.I&#8217;m actually in a USPAP class right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

