<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SharpMap is the new MapObjects?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarmac</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my poly&#039;s has many inner linear rings.  At first I thought it was me that introduced a drawing problem. Nothing helped. Then I discovered that not me but Geotools was the problem. After a short migration to Sharpmap all problem disolved. 
I like to thank all Sharpmap developers for their thoroughness. Sharpmap rules!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my poly&#8217;s has many inner linear rings.  At first I thought it was me that introduced a drawing problem. Nothing helped. Then I discovered that not me but Geotools was the problem. After a short migration to Sharpmap all problem disolved.<br />
I like to thank all Sharpmap developers for their thoroughness. Sharpmap rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Leo,

I&#039;ve not tried it with VB6. It&#039;s written completely in .Net and I&#039;ve never tried generating COM callable wrappers for it. I&#039;d be surprised if it worked completely. It would probably be better to direct your inquiry to the SharpMap team over at http://www.codeplex.com/sharpmap

Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leo,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not tried it with VB6. It&#8217;s written completely in .Net and I&#8217;ve never tried generating COM callable wrappers for it. I&#8217;d be surprised if it worked completely. It would probably be better to direct your inquiry to the SharpMap team over at <a href="http://www.codeplex.com/sharpmap" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/sharpmap</a></p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Dobrica</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo Dobrica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi James,

Could I use SharpMap with VB6?

thank you and best regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,</p>
<p>Could I use SharpMap with VB6?</p>
<p>thank you and best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can someone point me to a good direction for i just cannot even open the source due to missisng md5 data for sharpgps.  i did not try to open sharpmap yet.  i did a lot of mapobjects work in the past and i want to play the sharpmap to brush up my c# skill. 

by the way, if anyone want to buy some cheap electronic gadgets, please visit my website at www.byshipping.com.


thank you and best regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone point me to a good direction for i just cannot even open the source due to missisng md5 data for sharpgps.  i did not try to open sharpmap yet.  i did a lot of mapobjects work in the past and i want to play the sharpmap to brush up my c# skill. </p>
<p>by the way, if anyone want to buy some cheap electronic gadgets, please visit my website at <a href="http://www.byshipping.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.byshipping.com</a>.</p>
<p>thank you and best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Guidi</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diego Guidi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that the lacks of responses in the forums that someone talks is due mainly because now the developers are at work for the v 2.0, that looks very cool... the main problem in .NET opensource is that we need help from developers out there... :(
NetTopologySuite development is stopped at v1.7.2, but JTS team plans to release v1.9.0 really soon, with a lot of new cool features like PreparedGeometry support (http://tinyurl.com/ys7egk) that .NET world needs to use... :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the lacks of responses in the forums that someone talks is due mainly because now the developers are at work for the v 2.0, that looks very cool&#8230; the main problem in .NET opensource is that we need help from developers out there&#8230; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
NetTopologySuite development is stopped at v1.7.2, but JTS team plans to release v1.9.0 really soon, with a lot of new cool features like PreparedGeometry support (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ys7egk" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ys7egk</a>) that .NET world needs to use&#8230; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d have to agree with that. There are a few active developers, not including the contributors. Most of the forum posts have recent responses. For an independent project with no apparent corporate backing, it seems fairly active.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with that. There are a few active developers, not including the contributors. Most of the forum posts have recent responses. For an independent project with no apparent corporate backing, it seems fairly active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srweal</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[srweal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I&#039;m using SharpMap and the forums aren&#039;t as quiet as some people suggest.  I&#039;ve had good responses and been able to troubleshoot any bugs fairly quickly.  The developers are also quite active, but seem to be working on two different versions of SharpMap.  

SharpMap is perfect for my needs, as a simple mapping engine and it ties in nicely with NTS to allow more advanced geometry operations.  It&#039;s well worth a look.  Also allows reading/writing from spatial DBs and a range of formats.

Once of the other great points is that it can run without loading any software on the server,  meaning you can just dump the DLLs in the /bin directory and away you go.  Certainly a useful feature if using commercial hosting environments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m using SharpMap and the forums aren&#8217;t as quiet as some people suggest.  I&#8217;ve had good responses and been able to troubleshoot any bugs fairly quickly.  The developers are also quite active, but seem to be working on two different versions of SharpMap.  </p>
<p>SharpMap is perfect for my needs, as a simple mapping engine and it ties in nicely with NTS to allow more advanced geometry operations.  It&#8217;s well worth a look.  Also allows reading/writing from spatial DBs and a range of formats.</p>
<p>Once of the other great points is that it can run without loading any software on the server,  meaning you can just dump the DLLs in the /bin directory and away you go.  Certainly a useful feature if using commercial hosting environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Open Source - SharpMap is the new MapObjects?</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[University Update - Open Source - SharpMap is the new MapObjects?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]                Contact the Webmaster     Link to Article           open source SharpMap is the new MapObjects? &#187;  Posted at James Fee GIS Blog â€” [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]                Contact the Webmaster     Link to Article           open source SharpMap is the new MapObjects? &#187;  Posted at James Fee GIS Blog â€” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grinder</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree with others that it would serve ESRI well to offer up a lighter weight toolset.   I would love to deploy a WPF application using ESRI MapObjects.NET, but the current runtime deployment and cost is prohibitive for semi-commercial product.

SharpMap is a tremendous library that simply lacks an active community.   e-mails and discussion forum posts remain unanswered and it is simply difficult to communicate with the team.  Oh the perils of Open Source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with others that it would serve ESRI well to offer up a lighter weight toolset.   I would love to deploy a WPF application using ESRI MapObjects.NET, but the current runtime deployment and cost is prohibitive for semi-commercial product.</p>
<p>SharpMap is a tremendous library that simply lacks an active community.   e-mails and discussion forum posts remain unanswered and it is simply difficult to communicate with the team.  Oh the perils of Open Source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lefty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/08/14/sharpmap-is-the-new-mapobjects/#comment-6433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m wondering if Morton made the wrong decision.  SharpMap looks very impressive, the WebADF is nothing like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if Morton made the wrong decision.  SharpMap looks very impressive, the WebADF is nothing like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

