<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Acquires Multimap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@J Wallis - ah, but Multimap does WGS84, in fact they&#039;ve actually reprojected all the OS National Grid stuff... crazy guys ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J Wallis &#8211; ah, but Multimap does WGS84, in fact they&#8217;ve actually reprojected all the OS National Grid stuff&#8230; crazy guys <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial use - which API?
Ive fiddled around with GMaps and some of the tutorials (SQL &amp; PHP interests me most)  However the license agreement restricts me from delivering data to clients that require sensitive data to be restricted either by login or hosted on there Intranet.  

Ive heard OpenLayers is restriction free but not too keen on the layout.  Anyone have any recommendations ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commercial use &#8211; which API?<br />
Ive fiddled around with GMaps and some of the tutorials (SQL &amp; PHP interests me most)  However the license agreement restricts me from delivering data to clients that require sensitive data to be restricted either by login or hosted on there Intranet.  </p>
<p>Ive heard OpenLayers is restriction free but not too keen on the layout.  Anyone have any recommendations ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: london calling</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[london calling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some level of OS data should be available for &#039;non-commercial use&#039; in 2008. http://openspace.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/openspace/index.html  This will be via via a Javascript API and include 1:50,000 and &#039;Street View&#039; and a Gazeteer Service so you can look up all those &quot;far away towns&quot;... once the alpha testing has finished..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some level of OS data should be available for &#8216;non-commercial use&#8217; in 2008. <a href="http://openspace.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/openspace/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://openspace.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/openspace/index.html</a>  This will be via via a Javascript API and include 1:50,000 and &#8216;Street View&#8217; and a Gazeteer Service so you can look up all those &#8220;far away towns&#8221;&#8230; once the alpha testing has finished..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[make that 5-7 times not %]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make that 5-7 times not %</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$50M, that can&#039;t be right can it?  If a typical going rate for buying a company under normal conditions is 5-7% annual revenue, that would mean multi map was, totally tiny?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$50M, that can&#8217;t be right can it?  If a typical going rate for buying a company under normal conditions is 5-7% annual revenue, that would mean multi map was, totally tiny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Wallis</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Wallis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but WGS84 is good enough for everybody!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but WGS84 is good enough for everybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIMON</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SIMON]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another useful thing, before a lot of these online geocoders came about, was a quick and easy way to convert a few postcodes to xy British Nat Grid.  Gives useful info about spatial position that GMaps doesn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another useful thing, before a lot of these online geocoders came about, was a quick and easy way to convert a few postcodes to xy British Nat Grid.  Gives useful info about spatial position that GMaps doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Snape</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Snape]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a long time Multimap was useful because it had OS raster mapping at 1:25,000.  They now only have 1:50,000 base mapping which is not turned on be default.  It looks to me that they are moving away from OS data.  Without OS base mapping there is no real reason to use multimap.  I guess this delivers microsoft a large customer base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time Multimap was useful because it had OS raster mapping at 1:25,000.  They now only have 1:50,000 base mapping which is not turned on be default.  It looks to me that they are moving away from OS data.  Without OS base mapping there is no real reason to use multimap.  I guess this delivers microsoft a large customer base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Wallis</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Wallis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Richard

but didn&#039;t you know, Google Maps is better than everything!  Why would the UK not like WGS84?  I mean, if it is good enough for the rest of the world, it surely is good enough for the UK!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard</p>
<p>but didn&#8217;t you know, Google Maps is better than everything!  Why would the UK not like WGS84?  I mean, if it is good enough for the rest of the world, it surely is good enough for the UK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daethKiss</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daethKiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2007/12/12/microsoft-acquires-multimap/#comment-7533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article. I think Google maps is better than another programs because it is with high quality maps of everywhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I think Google maps is better than another programs because it is with high quality maps of everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

