<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ArcGIS Server REST API for 9.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/#comment-8708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunitely, Is is not available now..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunitely, Is is not available now..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Maddle</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/#comment-8707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Maddle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/10/arcgis-server-rest-api-for-92/#comment-8707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice demo - I&#039;d love to see it with a denser layer like like Census Tracts for California]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice demo &#8211; I&#8217;d love to see it with a denser layer like like Census Tracts for California</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

