Comments on: The ESRI Developer Summit 2008 Q&A http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/ Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: mdsumner http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8825 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:07:44 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8825 lb

]]> By: Mike http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8824 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:44 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8824 “Direct connect backwards compatibility”

It’s about fracking time!

]]> By: Luc Vaillancourt http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8823 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:41:48 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8823 My prefered one is this question / affirmation :

“Q: We are looking for improved ease of use and connectivity out of the box. The faster we can get GIS data back into the hands of those who are paying for it (not usually GIS savvy), the better.”

Very True … whatever the solution you use.

]]> By: Dave Bouwman http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8822 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:41:38 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8822 Re Doc Search – I’m not sure if they have anything in place that stops Google from indexing it – but if they worked with Google to try and make that indexing better, it would be a big improvement. Maybe talk to Microsoft because Google –> MSDN works really well.

Dave

]]> By: Adam http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8821 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:36 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/03/14/the-esri-developer-summit-2008-qa/#comment-8821 “We have no immediate plans to release a native 64-bit version of ArcGIS Desktop, although we do continue to research this possibility. ”

Why no immediate plans? Shouldn’t they have had immediate plans a long time ago? I’m baffled by this. Even just a blurb saying something like “We’re investigating into the…” would be nice.

]]>