<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidgshi</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davidgshi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was using the following to create gp in html file.

dojo.require(&quot;esri.tasks.gp&quot;);
        dojo.require(&quot;dojo.io.script&quot;);

function init() {       
        // Create the geoprocessor
        gp = new esri.tasks.Geoprocessor
                (&quot;http://scarcgisserver/ArcGIS/rest/services/dquery2/GPServer/datquery&quot;);


Everything works fine when the html file is opened on the server.

However, when the html file is accessed as a website (i.e. accessed from outside the server), the following error messages persist:

gp is not defined.

Uncaught exception: Could not load cross-domain resources: esri.nls.jsapi_en-gb

Any suggestions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using the following to create gp in html file.</p>
<p>dojo.require(&#8220;esri.tasks.gp&#8221;);<br />
        dojo.require(&#8220;dojo.io.script&#8221;);</p>
<p>function init() {<br />
        // Create the geoprocessor<br />
        gp = new esri.tasks.Geoprocessor<br />
                (&#8220;http://scarcgisserver/ArcGIS/rest/services/dquery2/GPServer/datquery&#8221;);</p>
<p>Everything works fine when the html file is opened on the server.</p>
<p>However, when the html file is accessed as a website (i.e. accessed from outside the server), the following error messages persist:</p>
<p>gp is not defined.</p>
<p>Uncaught exception: Could not load cross-domain resources: esri.nls.jsapi_en-gb</p>
<p>Any suggestions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stewart</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Stewart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://resources.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/ is up for me now - without an Release Candidate (RC) login. Yea! at last.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://resources.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/" rel="nofollow">http://resources.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/</a> is up for me now &#8211; without an Release Candidate (RC) login. Yea! at last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[considering that 9.2 SP5 clients can connect to 9.3 servers I get the impression that ESRI is more interested in getting the new server functionality out there than pushing people to upgrade their desktop stack.  After looking at the new server stuff I can say it is well worth it.  The performance increases with AGS alone are worth dumping 9.2 and going to 9.3.  The client is much more polished.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>considering that 9.2 SP5 clients can connect to 9.3 servers I get the impression that ESRI is more interested in getting the new server functionality out there than pushing people to upgrade their desktop stack.  After looking at the new server stuff I can say it is well worth it.  The performance increases with AGS alone are worth dumping 9.2 and going to 9.3.  The client is much more polished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkB</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Version 9.2 SR6 after 9.3 release, this appears pretty unusual to me.  Have they done this in recent times (can&#039;t recall)?  How should I interpret this, as upstanding customer support or we&#039;ve got some real problems here (no surprise)?  Maybe both, which would be a big improvement still.  Helps with that left in the lurch feeling some get.  I assume these are just general fixes ported back.  Looks like my laptop/desktop will be diverging for a little while.  

Any idea when the EDN documentation library will open for 9.3?  Does/will the resource center contain developer docs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 9.2 SR6 after 9.3 release, this appears pretty unusual to me.  Have they done this in recent times (can&#8217;t recall)?  How should I interpret this, as upstanding customer support or we&#8217;ve got some real problems here (no surprise)?  Maybe both, which would be a big improvement still.  Helps with that left in the lurch feeling some get.  I assume these are just general fixes ported back.  Looks like my laptop/desktop will be diverging for a little while.  </p>
<p>Any idea when the EDN documentation library will open for 9.3?  Does/will the resource center contain developer docs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laine</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might be being a bit thick here...how do you get a local copy of the JSAPI? 

I like the samples and everything works fine when using our own REST mapservices...but I don&#039;t want to use an external link for the JSAPI (and can&#039;t as the deploy environment is behind a corperate firewall). 

So what about a local copy of the JSAPI?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be being a bit thick here&#8230;how do you get a local copy of the JSAPI? </p>
<p>I like the samples and everything works fine when using our own REST mapservices&#8230;but I don&#8217;t want to use an external link for the JSAPI (and can&#8217;t as the deploy environment is behind a corperate firewall). </p>
<p>So what about a local copy of the JSAPI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bon</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sooo, after getting so excited by the new pop box with the pretty colors that told me the admatch I did last week in 9.2 that took 2.5 HOURS was only going to take 11 minutes, I left work with my laptop still going at 1 hour and counting...after all these years I still fall for the stoopid time estimates, doh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo, after getting so excited by the new pop box with the pretty colors that told me the admatch I did last week in 9.2 that took 2.5 HOURS was only going to take 11 minutes, I left work with my laptop still going at 1 hour and counting&#8230;after all these years I still fall for the stoopid time estimates, doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bon</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi - I prolly inadvertantly posted to the other thread and just found dan&#039;s post about the 30 boxes.  Did Data &amp; Maps change in the 9.3 release?  Specifically the StreetMap; geocoding is SO much faster in 9.3

TIA!  bon ^_^]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi &#8211; I prolly inadvertantly posted to the other thread and just found dan&#8217;s post about the 30 boxes.  Did Data &amp; Maps change in the 9.3 release?  Specifically the StreetMap; geocoding is SO much faster in 9.3</p>
<p>TIA!  bon ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Johnson</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone want to try v9.2 SR6 instead?

http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=downloads.patchesServicePacks.viewPatch&amp;PID=17&amp;MetaID=1406]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone want to try v9.2 SR6 instead?</p>
<p><a href="http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=downloads.patchesServicePacks.viewPatch&#038;PID=17&#038;MetaID=1406" rel="nofollow">http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=downloads.patchesServicePacks.viewPatch&#038;PID=17&#038;MetaID=1406</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone need 30 boxes of ESRI Data &amp; Maps 9.3?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone need 30 boxes of ESRI Data &amp; Maps 9.3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierre_k</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/07/02/more-esri-arcgis-93-news/#comment-9712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pierre_k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=1891#comment-9712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ChrisW
Yes, we are using views in the underlying database to solve this issue, but that does of course imply additional maintenance and deployment burden, not to mention cases when it comes down to changes in the data model.. uuuuh! Pain in the ***, this thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ChrisW<br />
Yes, we are using views in the underlying database to solve this issue, but that does of course imply additional maintenance and deployment burden, not to mention cases when it comes down to changes in the data model.. uuuuh! Pain in the ***, this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

