<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tempe Responds to GIS Data Request</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimben</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, government agencies need some way to recover all the money they&#039;ve wasted, um, er, invested on overpriced GIS software and consulting.
In the end, it winds up in some vendor&#039;s pocket.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, government agencies need some way to recover all the money they&#8217;ve wasted, um, er, invested on overpriced GIS software and consulting.<br />
In the end, it winds up in some vendor&#8217;s pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave lawrence</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i heard a rumor that AGIC recently changed the rules on data fees. have you heard anything about that? if so how would it impact tempe data fees?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard a rumor that AGIC recently changed the rules on data fees. have you heard anything about that? if so how would it impact tempe data fees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updates?</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t say that I&#039;m surprised they didn&#039;t get back to you.  They probably hope you&#039;ll just go away and they can get back to ignoring sharing data with their citizens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m surprised they didn&#8217;t get back to you.  They probably hope you&#8217;ll just go away and they can get back to ignoring sharing data with their citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No word from Tempe on my request other than to say they received it and would get back to me the next day.

I plan to follow up this week with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No word from Tempe on my request other than to say they received it and would get back to me the next day.</p>
<p>I plan to follow up this week with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updates?</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, any word from Tempe?  Did they fulfill your request?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, any word from Tempe?  Did they fulfill your request?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedC</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TedC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the cost of duplication is BS, too.  Perhaps they can upload their data to AGS Online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the cost of duplication is BS, too.  Perhaps they can upload their data to AGS Online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my experience, Navteq will not take e911 data anyway, so there is no concern about them deriving commercial profit from it.
Parcel data is really where the significant issue is.
911 surcharges do not pay one red cent of creation and maintenance of gis data sets. Every last cent goes directly to the phone companies themselves to maintain their 911 equipment.
(Yes, I work in e911 GIS for a pretty large county.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, Navteq will not take e911 data anyway, so there is no concern about them deriving commercial profit from it.<br />
Parcel data is really where the significant issue is.<br />
911 surcharges do not pay one red cent of creation and maintenance of gis data sets. Every last cent goes directly to the phone companies themselves to maintain their 911 equipment.<br />
(Yes, I work in e911 GIS for a pretty large county.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The history reference for ARS Â§39-121.03 says:
Added by Laws 1977, Ch. 54, Â§ 3, eff. May 17, 1977. Amended by Laws 1985, Ch. 213, Â§ 4.
ASU has a good step by step guide for researching legislative history:
http://www.law.asu.edu/library/azlegislativehistory
Unfortunately, I don&#039;t have access to those resources here... James? You do live in Tempe :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history reference for ARS Â§39-121.03 says:<br />
Added by Laws 1977, Ch. 54, Â§ 3, eff. May 17, 1977. Amended by Laws 1985, Ch. 213, Â§ 4.<br />
ASU has a good step by step guide for researching legislative history:<br />
<a href="http://www.law.asu.edu/library/azlegislativehistory" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.asu.edu/library/azlegislativehistory</a><br />
Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have access to those resources here&#8230; James? You do live in Tempe <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmg</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s wrong with businesses making a profit from free government data collected at taxpayer expense even if the government doesn&#039;t see the benefit of fulfilling the request?  Imagine what life would be like if the Census Bureau had decided to go with cost-recovery with the TIGER line files for the 1990 Census?  Its unlikely there would have been Wessex, MapQuest, Navtek, or TeleAtlas.  The return back to the economy is exponentially greater than if the data would have been sold to recover the costs of creating it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with businesses making a profit from free government data collected at taxpayer expense even if the government doesn&#8217;t see the benefit of fulfilling the request?  Imagine what life would be like if the Census Bureau had decided to go with cost-recovery with the TIGER line files for the 1990 Census?  Its unlikely there would have been Wessex, MapQuest, Navtek, or TeleAtlas.  The return back to the economy is exponentially greater than if the data would have been sold to recover the costs of creating it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhurley</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/12/01/tempe-responds-to-gis-data-request/#comment-12715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mhurley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3171#comment-12715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this sounds like Santa Clara County CA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this sounds like Santa Clara County CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

