Comments on: Reflections on the 2010 ESRI FedUC http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/ Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Thoughts On The 2010 ESRI PUG Conference | VizWorld.com http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13234 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:01:11 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13234 [...] I was surprised that the reaction of the audience around me was the exact opposite of what James Fee encountered at FedUC. While I wondered why the demo wasn’t being conducted live on an iPhone, everyone immediately [...]

]]> By: Redlands heroin addict http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13233 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:14:53 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13233 Editor’s Note: Really?

]]> By: Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13232 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:25:33 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13232 I’ve been running a host of 32-bit apps (ArcGIS, ERDAS IMAGINE, eCognition) on my Windows 7-64 box with 48GB or RAM for 8 months. All seem to run better than when I was using a 32-bit OS. In fact we were so impressed we moved other personnel over to 64-bit as well and upped their RAM.

What’s the theory behind the performance hit Archie?

]]> By: ArcX Tester http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13231 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:17:45 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13231 But be forewarned the performance will suck harder than it did when it sucked on a 32bit box.

Archie, this is not my experience. But there are many factors at play, for example, each app gets it’s own 32-bit address space to play in — instead of fighting for physical RAM with the OS and other applications.

Basic I/O operations can also soup up a bit, even if you are running in that 32-bit layer.

]]> By: ArcX Tester http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13230 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:13:42 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13230 No kidding!

]]> By: Archie Belaney http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13229 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:25:14 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13229 Barack doesn’t get the money, Jerry Lewis does.

And those donations usually come back as a $10-15mil earmark in defense appropriations tagged to The Center for Innovative Geospatial Technology.

]]> By: Barack Obama http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13228 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:20:52 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13228 Jack,

thank you for the large campaign contribution. We will get you some bailout money shortly.

-BO

]]> By: Jack Dangermond http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13227 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:05:16 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13227 Well, this is important work we’re doing Damian. This new release is very strong…it really is is very big. That’s interesting…don’t you think?

James, can’t you moderate this better? Who are these people?

]]> By: Damian Spangrud http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13226 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:12:24 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13226 wow – Now a Fake Damian!! I am so blessed….

sigh…

]]> By: Damian Spangrud http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/02/24/reflections-on-the-2010-esri-feduc/#comment-13225 Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:23:18 +0000 http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3359#comment-13225 comment removed

]]>