<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NITF for ArcGIS 9.3.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/</link>
	<description>Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mold Removal Ontario</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mold Removal Ontario]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On some government systems 9.3.1 is a distant dream! When I worked in that field I remember it taking 6-8 months before a service pack could get approved
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On some government systems 9.3.1 is a distant dream! When I worked in that field I remember it taking 6-8 months before a service pack could get approved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KoS</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KoS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He speaks the truth!

The certification process seems a tad longer here. About over a year! Ugh!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He speaks the truth!</p>
<p>The certification process seems a tad longer here. About over a year! Ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been available for 9.3.1 for a long time. The &quot;new&quot; part is that it is now free for all ArcGIS users.

An ArcGIS 10 version will be out soon... if I had to guess, long before the people who care get access to 10 en-masse
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been available for 9.3.1 for a long time. The &#8220;new&#8221; part is that it is now free for all ArcGIS users.</p>
<p>An ArcGIS 10 version will be out soon&#8230; if I had to guess, long before the people who care get access to 10 en-masse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie Belaney</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archie Belaney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they&#039;re just in time to start working on Ten. Maybe have that done when Twelve is launched?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they&#8217;re just in time to start working on Ten. Maybe have that done when Twelve is launched?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seajunk</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seajunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ArcGIS has supported NITF for a couple of years. This is just an update for 9.3.1. Certification takes time.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArcGIS has supported NITF for a couple of years. This is just an update for 9.3.1. Certification takes time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie Belaney</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archie Belaney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nit-iff. Now in Nine-Three-One. Oh, c&#039;mon...really?

Nit-iff is the big boy&#039;s industrial-strength image format. Baked into every single system and process that&#039;s even remotely connected to a geo-whatever inside the military-industrial complex.

The fact that it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt; available is stunning...not because it&#039;s such an advance or revelatory improvement, but because it took so farkin&#039; long to get this simple, basic, fundamental thing done.

Amazing a company can have such dominant market share and treat its customer base with such disdain. And it&#039;s not like they developed a good case of &#039;holier than thou&#039; as they grew, it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; been this way. Really.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nit-iff. Now in Nine-Three-One. Oh, c&#8217;mon&#8230;really?</p>
<p>Nit-iff is the big boy&#8217;s industrial-strength image format. Baked into every single system and process that&#8217;s even remotely connected to a geo-whatever inside the military-industrial complex.</p>
<p>The fact that it&#8217;s <em>now</em> available is stunning&#8230;not because it&#8217;s such an advance or revelatory improvement, but because it took so farkin&#8217; long to get this simple, basic, fundamental thing done.</p>
<p>Amazing a company can have such dominant market share and treat its customer base with such disdain. And it&#8217;s not like they developed a good case of &#8216;holier than thou&#8217; as they grew, it&#8217;s <em>always</em> been this way. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yodel</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yodel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea but that bing maps imagery rules!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea but that bing maps imagery rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack my man, this blog is me posting what I want to post.  It isn&#039;t a news blog or gis news aggregator.

Somehow Bing Maps showing Facebook junk doesn&#039;t interest me, but NITF does.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack my man, this blog is me posting what I want to post.  It isn&#8217;t a news blog or gis news aggregator.</p>
<p>Somehow Bing Maps showing Facebook junk doesn&#8217;t interest me, but NITF does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog, while once original and unique has now just become a pseudo ESRI news service that comments on what ESRI does.  Is there anything else you can write about than ESRI ?!?

And no, I&#039;m not an ESRI hater - quite the opposite.   I just don&#039;t get the reason to continually regurgitate ESRI news.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog, while once original and unique has now just become a pseudo ESRI news service that comments on what ESRI does.  Is there anything else you can write about than ESRI ?!?</p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m not an ESRI hater &#8211; quite the opposite.   I just don&#8217;t get the reason to continually regurgitate ESRI news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/07/21/nitf-for-arcgis-9-3-1/#comment-13802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/?p=3707#comment-13802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog, while once original and unique has now just become a pseudo ESRI news service that comments on what ESRI does.  Is there anything else you can write about than ESRI ?!?

And no, I&#039;m not an ESRI hater - quite the opposite.   I just don&#039;t get the reason to continually regurgitate ESRI news.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog, while once original and unique has now just become a pseudo ESRI news service that comments on what ESRI does.  Is there anything else you can write about than ESRI ?!?</p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m not an ESRI hater &#8211; quite the opposite.   I just don&#8217;t get the reason to continually regurgitate ESRI news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

