Google Fusion Tables – Are you kidding me? These stuff is “teh awesome”. Fusion tables are going to be more “killer” than Google Maps was. Yup, pay attention.
“teh awesome”? Seriously, who says that? Well I guess I did and that’s OK. Was it more “killer” than Google Maps, obviously no. It’s not that Fusion Tables was wrong, it is just there are so many alternatives to it that it really doesn’t matter anymore like it did when it first arrived.
Well if you’re like me, you probably have a lot of data in Fusion Tables and Google just sent out an email explaining how to get it out.
If you created many tables over the years, we’ve made it easy to download all your data in one step with a new dedicated Fusion Tables option in Google Takeout. You can save the rows, metadata and geometries of any base tables that you own, and export this data in the following formats: JSON, CSV and KML.
It’s a really nice tool, just tried it myself on some baseball data that I had in there. Google explains the tool as such:
The data for each table is saved to its own “archive”. The data will be saved in a Google Sheet; for datasets beyond the size limits of Sheets, you’ll get a CSV. This archive is stored in a top level folder called “ft-archive” in your Drive.
A Google Maps visualization is automatically created with the archived data. This map preserves many of the original Fusion Tables styling configurations. Any changes you make to the Sheet or CSV will appear in the map visualization.
A listing of all archived tables is stored in a Sheet. This handy Sheet is called “ft-archive-index” and lives within the “ft-archive” folder. The index Sheet summarizes each run of the archive tool and preserves the visualization URLs with encoded styles. Each time you run the archive tool, you will get additional archives based on the current data in your tables along with corresponding new rows in the archive directory.
You have until December 3, 2019 to get your data out. Google Takeout makes it easy which is really nice.
Yes everyone knows about What3Words. It was an attempt to come up with an easy way to assign addresses for places where there are none. In the end, a proprietary addressing system will never gain traction, and of course the inevitable eventually happened. My personal feeling is that What3Words never really got us beyond x/y numbering and the logic behind an addressing system was not there. Enter Plus codes which comes at this problem from a different perspective. There is a very detailed analysis of existing methods and why they choose to go this direction that I’ll leave it up to you to read.
Probably the biggest reason to pay attention is that this open addressing system was developed by Google. In fact, they are already implementing it in India as we speak which goes a very long way to making this happen.
All these systems are built on the idea the world is a grid, and how deeply you drill down into that grid is your address so things need not be a single point, they can be an area which opens up many exciting ideas for addressing, especially outside of North America and Europe. Check out the Github project to learn more.
Well I’m not sure how much this had to do with Waze being owned by Google or not but PhantomAlert is suing Waze.
Before the advent of GPS and navigation apps, cartographers sneaked “paper towns” and “trap streets” into their maps—fake points of interest that they used to detect plagiarism. If someone copied their map, it would be easily identifiable through the inclusion of those locations. That same trick has found its way into modern-day mapping systems: A new lawsuit brought against Google and its traffic app Waze cites sham points of interest as evidence that the Google-owned service copied from a competitor’s database.
Apparently these two companies tried to make a deal before Google snapped up Waze and PhantomAlert is alleging that Waze used their database to “boost its profile”. One of the biggest concerns in the OpenStreetMap community is allowing these intentional mistakes into their database. Copyright Easter Eggs is well documented on the OSM website.
A Copyright Easter Egg, in terms of mapping, is a feature that is drawn in a distinctive way in order to help identify its original author. It may be a nonexistent, or slightly or heavily distorted, map feature, or its name may be wrongly or unusually spelt.
The supposed main purpose of such a feature is to strengthen the author’s case in a copyright dispute. If he can show that his own unique feature appears in the defendant’s work, it is easier to prove that the defendant’s work is a copy of his.
Hey look, I got to use the new Google logo already!
Yea so if this is true, PhantomAlert has a pretty good idea that Waze stole their data and it could mean big trouble for Google. Having a closed database like this opens Waze up to these kinds of lawsuits because they are unable to have the community police the data. The big question is was this data imported into Waze intentionally or by accident. I don’t think the latter will get them off the hook but if there was intent it could be costly. We’ll have to see. The Waze byline about “outsmarting traffic, together” might not be too smart.
Indoor mapping is the white whale of our Spatial IT industry. We’re always reading about how our smartphones will lead us to the best deals or how I can find the specific nail I need in Home Depot without having to ask anyone or walk down every aisle. They key to all this is essentially iBeacon.
You can search Google News for all the latest excitement on the concept but essentially it is a way for your phone to know where things are and for the vendors to know where you phone is through Bluetooth. Imagine walking into a store and getting alerts about your favorite beer being on sale and then the ability to navigate directly there. Sexy right? Plus we’ve been anticipating this happening for years. Except…
Google was set to launch a new product that added context to one of its most successful apps, Google Maps. But earlier this year, it was shut down by Alphabet CEO Larry Page, according to people familiar with the project.
Google Here worked by sending a notification to a smartphone user’s lock screen within five seconds of their entering a partner’s location. If the user clicked on the notification, a full screen HTLM5 “app” experience would launch. Google Here would know when to send the notification via Google Maps and beacons placed in the stores of participating partners. Google planned to supply the beacons to partners for the launch, according to the document. The experience could also be found by going to the Google Maps app.
Exactly what we though everyone wanted. In testing the application was deemed too invasive and Google feared no retailers would sign up. That’s right, Google didn’t think could get their partners to install cheap beacons in their stores AND they feared they were too big brother. Seems weird doesn’t it, if there is one company that can get companies to spend money on ads, it is Google. And since when did Google ever think pushing ads on us was “invasive”?
The magic about Google Here (Here as in not Here that was owned by Nokia) was that you didn’t need an app running for it to work. Think about that for a minute, ads would appear on your phone based on where you where and you didn’t need to opt in to get them. Now we see why Google was very concerned that Here was going to get a large backlash. Being able to push ads on users would have been something they really could have sold well to companies, I’m not sure there would be any fear of companies not wanting to push ads on us.
Beacons are still very important to Google. Their Eddystone project talks about lots of uses of beacons but not for ad delivery. Clearly there was feedback on this project and it jolted Google out of their normal sell more ads business model. I think beacons will be very valuable as they start appearing in more areas, but I for one don’t need to get an ad for fabric softener every time I walk into a Target.
If there is one thing that gets the GeoMarketers excited, it is natural disasters. Every year at this time we see hurricane trackers, 3D storm viewers and other “exciting” products to help protect us from the wrath of mother nature. This year Google is promoting their Personalized Storm Tracker.
The safety recommendations you receive will be tailored to reflect the current status of the event and your context. For example, if you search for a specific storm when it’s still several days away, you may see a map of the developing weather event and a recommendation to start preparing an emergency kit. If the storm is only hours away from your location, you might receive a reminder to start charging your phone in case power goes out. And if you search when the storm is nearby, you’ll get the most urgent information, like how to avoid injury from fast-moving water or flying debris.
I feel like these things are more trouble than they are worth. Last Sunday I was at Sky Harbor Airport when a dust storm alert went off on all the iPhones in the baggage claim area. The whole place sounded loud as the alerts went off warning us that wind and dust were headed our way. The result of this great warning, people making jokes. Sure an alert was issued, sure it probably is a safety thing that we all get these alerts on our phones. But the delivery isn’t personalized, it’s a broadcast message and then 10 minutes of people joking about the alerts.
At least in the USA, storms don’t sneak up on anyone. These products are great press but of little value.
Well good news for those who want to help a down on its luck company like Google update their maps.
Google Map Maker, the tool which allows anyone around the world to contribute information to Google’s worldwide map, has re-opened in 45 countries after going live again in 6 countries two weeks ago. The product was temporarily shut down in May after it was discovered that some nefarious edits to the map, like geographic polygons shaped to depict an Android peeing on what is ostensibly an Apple logo, were being approved.
If you want to help Google, just go to Google Map Maker and start editing. Just know your edits will get locked up and used to make a ton of money. Here in the USA you can’t create polygons yet but I suppose that will be back soon.
The sale was a milestone for Israel’s young but huge startup community: The first Israeli consumer-app company to be bought for over $1 billion. In an instant, the whole “Startup Nation” decided to quit aiming for fast exits and build billion-dollar companies instead.
When Google bought Waze we were all amazed they paid $1B. Not so much in that we didn’t think Waze was going to sell for $1B1 but that Google needed them. In the end it was simple for Waze:
What made Google pretty attractive for us that No. 1, the company stayed in Israel. No. 2, we remained with our mission, to help drivers avoid traffic jams.
Well and that $1B was pretty attractive too. I’m honestly not sure what is going to happen to Waze moving forward. I still use it daily on my commute. Waze is partnering with cities to improve traffic results and I know millions of others rely on it for better traffic results than Google Maps or Apple Maps. But that’s the kicker right? Questions that come to mind to me are:
What’s the incentive to innovate beyond improving traffic results?
What’s the status of the maps behind the application, are they being updated?
Does Google plan to shut Waze down and “integrate” traffic into Google Maps?
Is Waze just another example of supporting a proprietary map only to see it be pulled away from the community?
Google bought Waze over 2 years ago. We haven’t seen anything new from Waze beyond these “partnering” programs2. I’ll continue to use Waze for my commuting because it is such a time save but the end game of Waze is probably not benefiting me.